Plans approved for a 170-bed retirement village in Knowle, replacing Stripes Hill farmhouse with care units and community facilities.
Inspired Villages will manage the property. They plan to build a retirement community. It will feature bungalows, cottages, and apartments. Residents can enjoy many facilities, including a cafe and restaurant. Plans include a gym and swimming pool with a garden and orchard also in the works. Locals can use the fitness area with a membership.
Coombs & Senior Living Ltd submitted the plans. They asked for full approval for 48 units including the village center. They sought permission for 122 more units with community space and gardens. The Solihull Council planning committee reviewed it all.
Laura Taylor, a planning officer, pointed out benefits. She mentioned housing for older people, allowing them to live within the community. The proposal was recommended for approval, depending on conditions and an agreement.
The public shared concerns. Twenty-one people objected; they worried about privacy and increased traffic. Some feared Knowle would lose its identity and cited potential four-story buildings. The site’s overall location was questioned too.
Councillor Dave Pinwell spoke up. He stated the need for elderly housing is not current, mentioning many unsold properties already exist. He asked if sacrificing green space was worth it and argued the need should be desperate.
Katherine Else defended the plan. She argued extra care units were needed and cited the council’s own data. The council cabinet approved the site for housing.
Councillor Bob Grinsell emphasized the housing need. Councillor Martin McCarthy saw low demand. He based this impression on unsold properties.
Mark Andrews, a planning officer, responded. He considered broader evidence citing strategic need and population growth. He also noted long-term housing requirements.
Councillors first voted to postpone the vote. The vote resulted in a tie. The chairman broke the tie, defeating the motion. The application then passed with five council members approving it and one voting against it. The meeting took place on February 5.