Developer removes hedge rich in species before decision on 162 homes, sparking local concerns and debate.
In June 2019, the developer proposed more design details, reducing the number of houses to 162 after talks with planning officials. This development required removing a hedge, which upset local residents due to its loss.
The developer and the council stated the removal matched the initial planning permission, and the work was done outside nesting season, protecting local wildlife. Laws protect hedges in rural areas, typically requiring permission for removal.
Robert Brown, a local resident, complained to the council’s enforcement team, who replied that nothing wrong had happened. Brown believes this is incorrect, as the hedge was full of different plant species.
The hedge included blackthorn and hawthorn trees, along with hazel, dog rose, and holly. It was cut regularly to maintain its shape. Brown argued that its removal breaks planning rules, but Persimmon claims they had permission to remove that hedge section.
Persimmon stated the work was to allow site access and is separate from the live planning application. They expressed their intention to work well with the council, aiming to build homes for families.
Somerset Council said they weren’t told about the hedge removal, but it was allowed in the initial planning plan for the planned access point. The work also took place outside the bird nesting season.
The council stated that no rules were broken because the initial permission included consent for site access. They are still considering the detailed plans and will decide when all details are finalized.