Developers will meet with residents to discuss concerns about a proposed crematorium in Daviot, addressing noise, traffic and safety.
Many people object to the crematorium. Eighty-four letters have been sent expressing concerns including noise, safety, and the necessity of the facility. Residents and business owners have spoken out against the proposal.
Stewart Trailers is located near the proposed crematorium site. James Stewart worries about potential noise complaints that might arise. He fears that loud work from the company could disrupt funeral services and potentially lead to restrictions on his business.
He explains that steel processing at Stewart Trailers creates significant noise. This could clash with moments of silence during funeral services. He also expresses concern about job security, as the company employs many local residents.
Mandy Stewart added that forklifts also contribute to unwanted sounds. A noise assessment was conducted, which identified the road as the primary source of noise. The report concluded that the impact of trailer noise would be minimal.
The solicitor, Stephen Park, responded to the concerns, stating that business at Stewart Trailers shouldn’t be affected. James Stewart also voiced concerns regarding road safety, referring to the B9001 as a “race track.”
He believes the road is already dangerous due to fast traffic and blind corners. He predicts the crematorium will significantly increase traffic volume, estimating around 1,000 additional car trips daily.
Stephen Park stated that the council’s roads team has no objections to the proposal. He noted that the road can handle the current traffic volume and that the additional crematorium traffic will have a slight impact. He also assures that cars will queue within the site, minimizing external congestion.
Some objectors question the need for another crematorium. They point out the existence of other facilities nearby in Aberdeen, Crathes, and Buckie. Additionally, another crematorium has already been approved in Chapelton.
However, developers argue that demand for cremation services is high. They claim people currently experience weeks-long waits. Their goal is to reduce these waiting times, citing a forecasted increase in the death rate.
They believe that offering a closer option will naturally increase demand. Furthermore, burial plots have become expensive, and cemetery space is increasingly scarce. People will travel from further areas to utilize the facility.
The developers expect the facility to be fully operational within years and believe it will provide a much-needed service. Objectors dispute the chosen site, suggesting Ellon as a more suitable location.
Barry Howard questioned the significance of the view from the site, noting its proximity to an industrial area. He argues that views are unimportant during times of grief, while Lorraine Howard views the project as exploiting grief.
Developers defend the Daviot site selection, stating that land acquisition can be costly. They emphasize that the site is located far from the village and will feature mature landscaping. A sedum roof will also help it blend into the environment.
Fraser Milne stated, “We live there too,” emphasizing their commitment to ensuring the crematorium fits in well. Stephen Park also addressed the scenic claim, suggesting that natural light adds value. He clarified that making money from grief isn’t the primary motive. He stated their aim is a pleasant and comforting facility, and added that people do not view funerals as tourism.
Some residents have expressed fears regarding toxic chemicals and their potential impact on local schools and homes. The developers trust SEPA’s (Scottish Environment Protection Agency) licensing process to address these concerns. Stephen Park responded to the pollution fears, stating, “Science does not support that view.” He claims that harmful emissions won’t affect the surrounding village.
Janelle Milne stated, “We live in that location, why would we risk harm?” The decision regarding the facility’s fate is expected soon, with a meeting scheduled for March 13.
Stephen Park concluded with reassurance, promising, “We will be a good neighbor.” He emphasized that they stand behind their plan, even if some residents remain unconvinced.