Trial reveals Rebecca Hanson was unstable and possibly biased against Charles during divorce proceedings.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd242/dd242f5dc63c56b1442fc2c6a41dcdac2c787284" alt="Charles Hanson’s Wife Had Agenda Against Him, Trial Hears Charles Hanson’s Wife Had Agenda Against Him, Trial Hears"
The prosecution highlighted WhatsApp messages, believing them to be confessions. Charles denies all charges against him, including control, abuse, and assault.
The lawyer stated the case hinges on Mrs. Hanson’s testimony. As the key witness, she had initiated divorce proceedings, citing an issue from January 2023 when Charles moved furniture inside.
The court learned that Mrs. Hanson allegedly verbally abused Charles, calling him a “selfish idiot” and making comments about caring for women. She also stated she wouldn’t eat his curry.
The lawyer told the jury what doesn’t qualify as coercive control, arguing that surprise furniture and being late do not fit the definition.
The lawyer argued Mrs Hanson had a dominant role. She questioned Mrs. Hanson’s photos, highlighting that all evidence originates from her, with even her mother and friend echoing her words.
Rebecca made the allegations and started divorce in June 2023. The lawyer suggested she likely had an agenda, noting that separation is hard and often creates bias.
The lawyer called Rebecca vindictive, unstable, and sad. She claimed Rebecca felt wronged by life, despite living a dream life with a big house and a cleaner.
Mrs. Hanson had a huge garden with gardeners, and even the dog had a walker. Charles worked hard to afford this lifestyle, running auctions and traveling often to earn a lot.
The lawyer states Rebecca resented his work and did not appreciate him. The lawyer accused Rebecca of wanting the jury to see Charles as an “ogre.”
The lawyer questioned why Rebecca cared about his timing. She suggested that if Charles was violent, she’d logically want him gone. Even as the marriage failed, she complained he was late, suggesting the issue was a lack of attention, not violence.
The lawyer reinforced that Rebecca was not controlled, but felt neglected. She stated neglect is not violence or control.
The lawyer then addressed the WhatsApp claims, arguing the texts don’t show confessions. The “chucked around” text was an apology, even if he did nothing wrong.
Rebecca made thirteen allegations, the lawyer said. None described her being “chucked around.”
The prosecutor said Charles’ story was unbelievable. The lawyer’s speech will continue, after which the judge will review the case. The trial is currently ongoing.